Ibori argues that the Supreme Court judgment is against true federalism principles. Read more on the implications of this decision and public reactions!
In a recent statement, former Governor of Delta State, James Ibori, expressed his strong disapproval of the Supreme Court's judgment granting full autonomy to local governments. According to Ibori, the decision represents a significant setback for the principles of federalism as defined by Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
He took to his X account to voice his concerns, citing constitutional provisions that he believes the ruling undermines. Ibori argued that the ruling contradicts the explicit language of Section 162, which outlines the distribution of funds from the Federation Account among the Federal, State, and Local Governments.
He emphasized that each state is required to maintain a special account known as the 'State Joint Local Government Account,' where allocations to local governments are to be deposited.
According to him,
That Local Governments must be “democratically elected “ goes without saying. Yes, I agree, that’s the position of the constitution but withholding their allocation is not the way to go. It’s wrong.
Ibori contended that the Supreme Court has effectively centralized power by allowing direct federal control over local government finances, which he views as contrary to the foundational principles of federalism.
Implications of Supreme Court Ruling on Local Governance
The Supreme Court's decision to grant full autonomy to local governments has far-reaching implications for local governance in Nigeria. The ruling prevents state governors from withholding funds allocated to local government councils, thereby ensuring direct funding and greater financial independence for local governments.
While this decision is seen as a victory for local government autonomy, it also raises concerns about the balance of power between the federal and state governments. Ibori, among others, fears that this ruling could set a precedent for further federal intervention in areas traditionally reserved for state governance, potentially leading to a more centralized system of government.
Nigerians React Contrary to James Ibori's Statement
Many Nigerians have voiced their opinions, often diverging from Ibori's perspective, in response to former Governor James Ibori's criticism of the Supreme Court's judgment on local government autonomy. While Ibori views the ruling as a setback to federalism, numerous citizens and political analysts believe it represents a positive step towards strengthening local governance and reducing corruption.
One Wale Adedayo, X user, reacts
This is the song the governors will be singing from now on.
How did you miss the fact that the governors refused to assent to the constitutional amendment sent by the senate in 2023.
You people want to continue living large on the people’s funds while claiming legal reasons. Tueh!
The public largely welcomed the Supreme Court's decision, arguing that granting full autonomy to local governments will lead to more efficient and transparent administration at the grassroots level. They believe that direct funding to local governments will curtail the misuse of funds by state governments and promote development projects that directly benefit local communities.